Posts Tagged ‘Norman Macht’

Rube Waddell, A.D.D.

October 11, 2012

Long before our awareness of “Attention Deficit Disorder” and the medications that help to control the behavior that spins from this condition, there were people in this world like George Edward “Rube” Waddell, the Hall of Fame lefty pitcher that lit up batters during the first decade of the twentieth century and the American League.

Rube was a virtual savant performer, able to pitch with the best in the world against other greats like Cy Young, Addie Joss, and Walter Johnson and winning far more often than losing against some of the best of the American League.

As we vividly note in Norman Macht’s first volume on Connie Mack, the price a club paid for having the talents of Waddell on their side was the personal behavior of the man himself. Left to his own devices, urges, impulses, attractions, and addictions, Rube was every pound and muscle inch little more than an overgrown child with no control over his distractions from the game of baseball and his contractual obligations to the club. Waddell would sometimes disappear for days or weeks to tend bar somewhere, go fishing, or hang out with new friends he met along the way. He was able to come back because of the talent he brought with him. An average or marginal pitcher would have been finished at the first turn down this “bad actor” lane.

And Rube Waddell had a temper that could frighten anyone, if they pushed the right buttons long enough. On page 322 of Norman Macht’s “Connie Mack and The Early Years of Baseball,” the author describes the Athletics Manager Connie Mack’s lesson in the first decade of the 20th century from Waddell’s temper after the eccentric lefty returned to the club on the heels of being jailed on an assault and battery charge:

“I went after him strong,” Mack said. “I was laying on the words thick and fast and I saw a nasty look come into Rube’s eyes.” Quick as a flash it dawned on me that I had gone too far. Breaking off in the middle of a scorching sentence, I reached out my hand and said, ‘Say, Rube, I had you that time. All that time you thought I was in earnest.’ And do you know that great big fellow who was ready a few seconds earlier to throw me through the door actually broke down and cried.”

Yep. “Anger Management” would have been a good alternative recommendation back then, but there was no such option back in Rube Waddell’s “Turn of the 20th Century” era. Then as now, the jailhouse is still our best option for those fists, knives, or guns people who take out their anger upon others. “Anger Management” only works for people who choose it soberly in calmer moments.

Rube Waddell wasn’t just about anger. His mind and behavior were all over the place, fitting him almost everywhere in the psychiatric lexicon of things. As a psychiatric disorder, Rube Waddell is variously diagnosable all over the psychiatric diagnostic manual dial as a schizophrenic, a bi-polar disorder, a character disorder bordering on sociopathy, an inadequate personality disorder, an alcoholic and/or drug addict, or even a codependent relationship partner.

His behavior often suggested that he was not particularly grounded in reality; he suffered mood swings from out of control highs to down in the depth lows; he sometimes took advantage of people in ways that showed little concern from him about the suffering they had endured from his behavior; he could binge drink for days and weeks; and he probably used other substances that helped him self medicate the difficult feelings he housed.

Rube was famous for chasing fire trucks, supposedly leaving his dugout during games to chase a fire-wagon down the street. I’m not really sure how often this sort of thing happened, but it serves as a good model for the kind of behavior that is typical of some people who suffer from “Attention Deficit Disorder” as a hard level of extreme distractibility from long-term attention to an engagement at hand. A.D.D. people have trouble at work and home because they simply cannot stay focused on what is going on in the moment for very long. A.D.D. seems to derive from some kind of biochemical imbalance which responds well in many people to the kinds of meds we now have available.

There were no efficacious treatment drugs for A.D.D. in Rube Waddell’s time. Rube did what most people still do to medicate themselves. They drink and drug themselves with whatever is available as a mind-altering substance, most often suffering the downside of whatever flows from the loss of impulse control effects that flow from entertainment drinks and substances.

I cannot place old Rube in any category for sure since I’ll never have a chance to meet him in this lifetime, but I will hedge enough to suggest that his two principal issues were “Bi-polar Mood Disorder” with “Attention Deficit Disorder” and that any treatment for him would begin or end with the presence or absence of appropriate  medication, administered to a patient who was willing to start his treatment by taking his medication regularly as prescribed. Only then could we move on to the stuff that might have mattered.

I still like old Rube. Waddell is history’s proof that you don’t always have to have peace of mind, relationship sanity, or a full grip on reality to do great things that entertain, but do not bring harm to others.

For that HOF Bling, the Story’s the Thing

August 9, 2012

“What do you mean that moment was just another myth in my narrative, didn’t you see the artist painting my picture as I pointed to center field?”

When it comes to get into the Baseball Hall of Fame, it ought to be some kind of objective standard of true greatness that unlocks the door for candidates, but it isn’t. It’s more about popularity and myth, sort of as it is in our election of politicians to the presidency and other high offices of national service. Remember the words of family patriarch Joseph Kennedy when he told his sons, and I’m paraphrasing here, “Remember, Boys, it’s not who you are when it comes to running for office; its who people think you are.”

Apparently, the Hall of Fame works that way too. One of my favorite contributors here is a fellow from SABR that I’ve never met, a fellow named Cliff Blau. I like Cliff because he points out my errors and helps me keep on focus in my subject matter, two things that every writer of non-fiction, no matter how humble his or her podium is, needs to do: (1) Get it right, and (2) Stay on topic.

In response to my column about Ross Youngs getting into the Hall with career stats that were good, but really no better than contemporary fellow Texan Curt Walker, Curt Blau left the following public comment:

Youngs isn’t in the Hall because he played for McGraw. He’s in because he played with Bill Terry and Frankie Frisch, who dominated the Veteran’s Committee, and got all their buddies in.

Youngs, incidentally, was not a center fielder, but a right fielder. I can see why you’d be confused, because John McGraw was quoted as saying Youngs was the best outfielder he ever saw. Of course, if he had meant that, he’d have played Youngs in CF, which requires more skill than RF.

Anyway, the HOF doesn’t honor greatness. That’s been clear since 1937. It honors favorable narratives.

The wonderful Connie Mack biographer Norman Macht essentially wrote me the same thing about the influence of Bill Terry by e-mail a day or so earlier. And Norman Macht is one of the most dedicated seekers of truth over lore that I’ve ever actually met in the world of baseball research. I also have a strong hunch that Macht would agree with Blau’s last statement that “the HOF doesn’t honor greatness. That’s been clear since 1937. It honors favorable narratives.” I simply cannot speak with certainty for Norman Macht. He alone is allowed that privilege.

How strong is “narrative” – or story – in the pursuit of the White House or the Baseball Hall of Fame? It appears to be pretty darn powerful, the invisible, but tangible forced behind that old saying, “It’s not what you know (or do) that really matters; it’s who you know.” – The narrative includes the connected people who speak up for candidates on everything from getting good jobs to the attainment of high honors. And these leaps are often great enough to bypass others who are more qualified or more worthy of the honor that goes with the appointment.

Of all nights, I can’t believe I left my axe at home.”

Legends are interesting, but, do we really need any more movies made 150 years after the fact about rail-spliting, axe-wielding presidents who also lived secret lives as vampire hunters and once served as the subject of a political baseball cartoon in which he wielded a bat rather than an axe? If we do, let’s elect Abraham Lincoln to the Baseball Hall of Fame without further delay!

Right, Cliff? – Right, Norman?

Administrative Note: Today marks my 1,000th column since the time The Pecan Park Eagle moved here to WordPress in 2009. Before that, we had about 600 posts under the same title at ChronCom from 2007 to 2009. Thanks to all of you who care enough to read what we have to offer on baseball, Houston history, and other musings.